The Guide contains how-to-do-it advice on starting, developing and sustaining fresh expressions of church based on shared experiences.
More about The Guide
The Guide contains how-to-do-it advice on starting, developing and sustaining fresh expressions of church based on shared experiences.
More about The Guide
Posted by Andrew Wooding on 25 April 2008
Mention the word 'evangelism' to the average person and it will likely conjure up images of the lone evangelist on the street corner handing out tracts, a besuited man on a soapbox spouting forth at Speakers' Corner in Hyde Park, or the international speaker striding energetically across a stage at an evangelistic rally.
But just as God said, 'It is not good for man to be alone', it might also be true to say that 'It is not good for evangelists to be alone'. Indeed, there is a page on Share about this very subject: God works through communities, which urges that 'Communities should be at the heart of mission'.
I am a trained evangelist and I confess that I have done my share of lone evangelism. Talks at school assemblies. Parachuting into mission situations to 'do my thing' then parachuting out again. Hospital or door-to-door visiting. That sort of thing.
So I am attracted to this idea that the life of a community shows God to the world, rather than any individual. As the hymn goes: 'They shall know we are Christians by our love'. In a society where there is so much distrust for words, our relationships could speak volumes.
But how does this work in practice? How exactly can a community be evangelistic? Does this mean you now have lots of people on that street corner handing out tracts? Does your Christian community try and stand on that soapbox at Speakers' Corner – bit of a tight fit. And do you appear together on that stage at the evangelistic rally, all talking at once?
I'm exaggerating, but the gist of my question is: if our community is to be evangelistic, how can it be lived out in public in full sight of people outside the community? How can we stop our community becoming closed and cliquey, happening behind locked doors purely for our own benefit?
I know of a group of Christians in Sheffield who meet each week in a pub for Bible study and prayer. They could have booked a function room, but instead they meet round a table in the main drinking area in full view of everyone. Over the months and years, this has led to trust and respect from the regulars, and lots of conversations.
Also, what implication does this way of thinking have on our churches? Traditionally, they have equipped individuals to do evangelism. If they sent out communities to do evangelism, would these communities form the core of new congregations? As it says in God works through communities: 'Instead of "Sunday" church being about sending individuals into the world from Monday to Saturday, fresh expressions can be understood as the sending of tiny communities into the world.'
Maybe you disagree, or have some practical advice from your own experience that you would like to Share with myself and others. If so, a comment left at the end of this blog, or on the page God works through communities, would be much appreciated!
Comments
Evangelism
Posted by Stefan Wozny on 3 June 2008 - 16:37
Interesting read.
We run something called Church in da Pub here in South Africa.
We have a meeting at 07h00 every Sunday morning. It last for about an hour or so.
The end of the discussion/sermon is a question and answer time.
We did this in the pub because we wanted to reach those who are the 'lost and forgotten' and who would not go into a normal churchy building thingy.
Would that be classed as a fresh expression?
We don't do evangelism as such, meaning a specific task, but I suppose the fact that we meet in a pub sort of invites people in to be evangelised doesn't it.
Also, here in South Africa, doing door to door or street evangelism is a challenge in itself if you wanted to do it. First, if going door to door you have to get past the dogs, the security gates, electric fences etc. and if you press the buzzer at the gate the chances are they won't let you in!
Cheers!
Pops
community
Posted by Pete Pillinger on 20 May 2008 - 09:09
Hi Andrew,
good to read your article, authentic Christian communities with integrity will be naturally attractive. This is born out by the experience of some of the neo-monastic communities.
Pete
evangelism and community
Posted by Simon Foulkes on 28 April 2008 - 20:17
I thought this article makes a bit of a false dichotomy. The go-it-alone evangelist is surely a caricature by now? The kind of people who seem to be in view, in fact generally work with mission teams, local churches and groups, and have reference bodies for accountability. Local churches which invite evangelists to engage in evangelism usually arrive at their decision to invite by a process of consultation and democratic assessment. Yes, there are people who just pitch up with a soapbox and start shouting but they are relatively few, almost certainly in need of counselling, and surely not worth debating in this blog.
The irony is that those gifted with evangelism often describe themselves as feeling vulnerable and isolated because of the body of Christ's weakness in embracing and encouraging their gifts. Thank God that has been changing in the last few years; and let's not bog ourselves down in an artificial and false debate about individuals and community. No man (or woman) - or evangelist - is an island! And - in closing - note the bits of good practice embedded in all the recent official reports - missioners are to be accompanied, evangelists to be mentored, pastors to be accountable to prayer partners.
Posted by Andrew Wooding on 2 May 2008 - 09:55
Hello Simon,
Great reply. Thanks! Yes, I was using exaggeration and caricature to make a point.
I am a trained evangelist working in Church Army and yes, much evangelism now happens in teams. But are teams the same as communities? Teams are united by a task, but communities are about sharing our lives together long-term. It is communities doing evangelism that I am interested in. What does this look like in practice?
How can we move from being teams to real communities? And what are the implications for our sending churches - when they are not just sending out teams, but sending out real, living communities?
Andrew Wooding