The Guide contains how-to-do-it advice on starting, developing and sustaining fresh expressions of church based on shared experiences.
More about The Guide
Posted by: Andrew Wooding - 18 June 2009
In the last five years with the Moot Community, and in the previous ten with the Epicentre Network, I have been on a journey attempting to do worship, mission and community in the context of post-modern spiritual tourism. You will have come across this every time someone says the mantra: 'I am not religious; I am interested in spirituality.' It has been a journey where this context has really changed me quite profoundly.
For too long the church has been bound to unhelpful binaries: lay and ordained, Catholic and Protestant, activist or personal piety, radical and mainstream, and so on. The truth is, if we stand a chance of ever making an impact with the de- and unchurched who are interested in spirituality as a mission imperative, then we will need to draw on variant elements of the wide traditions of our Christian inheritance.
We need to get away from this ridiculous 'them and us' which finds its foundation in misunderstanding, lack of love and fear. I think practitioners of emerging and fresh expressions of church in a post-modern context understand the post-binary holistic need for this more acutely than their predecessors. So, as practitioners, we can draw on 2,000 years of resources of the church to assist us in this task.
Many people interested in spirituality today trawl the internet seeking spiritual communities that do - and are - what they say they are. They seek communities of integrity where there is love, openness, honesty, inclusion and participation. Unfortunately, too many churches feel like incredibly dysfunctional families where few of these qualities are evident. They are, in effect, spiritually impoverished. The prevailing church culture remains cognitive and propositional rather than experiential.
At the same time, many people are seeking something that goes beyond materialism, consumption and technology. Many have become aware of this need through personal tragedy, addiction, life stages, illness or study. So the challenge is: how to provide opportunities for authentic worship, mission and community for people who are seeking to become more deeply human, unaware that this is a spiritual quest. Such people often do not know who they are, let alone that they have a need for God!
How do you engage with spiritual tourists whilst being authentically Christian? Well, I would encourage people here to really consider models of church. Why? Because if you don't your project will end up with something that is dumbed down, individualistic and consumptive as a default position. This is where the new monastic or new friar model can really help if you are engaging with spiritual tourists.
One of the main mistakes we made with the Epicentre Network is that it was held captive to deconstruction, consumption, individualism and was somewhat anti-theological. Yes, it was very participative, but the lack of a model made it difficult to have a healthy basis. It was a collective of individuals that was never fully able to become a community because of its inability to re-envision or reconstruct. We ended Epicentre after ten good years of exciting and innovative mission activity because it was impossible for it to grow into being fully church. This was a painful lesson.
With Moot in its early days, we focused on the need to balance hospitality and inclusion with the authentic practice of the faith. Yes, experimental and contextual, but authentically Christian all the same. We were struck with the question: 'How do we have a community that allows people to belong who do not believe; that allows them to experience the community; that is authentic and life-giving without dumbing down on the faith?' It was Steve Croft who suggested to me the use of a rhythm of life as a focus to the community, so that it be Christ-centred.
Moot, inspired by the monastic pre-modern rules, crafted a rhythm of life through a communal bottom-up process to form an aspiration for how we wanted to live. Its language was not churchy but spiritual and embodied the gospel. So now we have a mixed community of both committed Christians and those who are spiritually searching, all desiring to live out these aspirations as a form of discipleship, where people are at different stages of the journey.
The pre-modern model of the monastics - and in particular the friars who had a spiritual rhythm of life and were sent to service particular localities - enables us to reframe new monasticism as a helpful model for an open, accessible Christian community with a focus on experience and exploration, that assists people to shift from being spiritual tourists to communitarian co-travelling pilgrims. Moot has developed sacramental (focusing on God's presence with us) and experiential forms of worship, mission and community drawing on this new monastic basis.
So, ancient forms of Christian contemplation reframed into post-modern language and sensibilities become the resources for prayer that work in terms of bringing centredness and peace. Mission then becomes seeking to catch up with what God is already doing in loving service by the whole community through social justice projects, the arts and other imaginative pursuits, and worship becomes an event of encounter of God and other pilgrims as a place of inspiration and hope-sharing.
If you are interested in going deeper with this, check out my two books: The Becoming of G-d and Emerging & Fresh Expressions of Church, both available here.
Bio: Ian Mobsby, author, priest missioner, fresh expressions core team member and associate lecturer in theological education
Blog: www.ianmobsby.net
Moot: www.moot.uk.net
Comments
Good point, but its only one point
Posted by Laurence Keith on 23 January 09 - 10:56
i would liike to fly a couple of other flags that can work and are valid alternatives...
one is simply that most churches have an older clientele, so will be effective in different ways and will not expect to be engaging with spiritual tourists surfing the net. nor should they - its a totally different culture.
the other is that i think its very possible to have a fresh expression/new monastic community without having a rule of life, or having to dig into ancient customs. i do however completely agree that some framework or boundaries are required at the start to enable a community to grow - we had a very similar experience to you in Sheffield about 4 years ago, having to end a group as it just couldn't build together.
anyway, thanks, and theres a couple of alternative thoughts.
Laul
Posted by Ian Mobsby on 03 March 09 - 07:28
Totally agree that not all new monastic communities need to focus on spiritual tourists - its just that many like Moot, mayBE, COTA and others are.
I do think that a ROL is essential, or the project will default to something centred on consumption, and if we are serious about New Monasticism, then there is a very strong reason for why ROL have been used for centuries. For me it is beyond a set of values or framework - I have to confess that as potentially dangerous in dumbing down the spirituality needed to sustain such an alternative community. To reconstruct is key, and consumption if it is the focus will kill any project.
I have written about this in more depth than i can here in my new book the 'Becoming of G-d'.
Posted by Laurence Keith on 03 March 09 - 11:55
Posted by Laurence Keith on 03 March 09 - 16:17
i guess the reason this topic gets me is a kind of background assumption that without our God people will tend towards all manner of depravities and their lives are full of mess. its simply not true.
Also implicit in this understanding is that Christian leaders are less like that, that discipleship goes one way (from the centre out) - hense the concept develops that Christians offer non-Christians shape and structure that of course they cannot do without. This too, is simply not true.
it is doubtless true for some sections of society that 'i shop therefore i am', but that falls frighteningly short for a general human condition.
Posted by Ian Mobsby on 17 July 09 - 00:55
I think we exist in a culture defined by consumption and information technology. I think there is a lot of evidence to suggest that this affects every aspect of our society, and that to not recognise this drives a certain world view and pattern would be dishonest. I am arguing that this paradigm pervades even aspirations towards relationships. So your comment about people wanting relaitonships rather than possessions does not undo the consumptive way people seek relaitonships. I think you read a rhythm of life wrong. It is an inspiration model where we all get it wrong but desire to go deeper. A ROL is just a way to join in the journey drawing on an incarnational theology rather than a redemptive theology. We are all broken stumbling towards salvation.... I don't think it at all has to do with leaders getting it right. If you don't mind me saying, that is a bit cynical and not at al what I am saying. I am baffled by your last line.... consumption whether we like it or not is a key value of contemporary culture - retail therapy - is very common. We should meet sometime, as I am sure you are misunderstanding what I am driving at, which I think a discussion over a beer will help. I am promoting the need for an incarnational approach - to Christian becoming in a culture running to the logic of consumption and market economics. If I was approaching this purely with a redemptive theology, I would agree with your points, but to reiterate, I am not.