The Guide

The Guide contains how-to-do-it advice on starting, developing and sustaining fresh expressions of church based on shared experiences.
More about The Guide

Browse The Guide

Tag Cloud (what is this?)

See all the tags

How deep are we willing to go? (by Mark Berry)

Posted by: Andrew Wooding - 15 February 2010

Mark BerryGraham Cray told General Synod last week that a crucial factor in the spread of fresh expressions has been 'a new imagination about the form or shape of church'. He is right. We have seen over the last half decade an exploration emerge which concerns not just the stylistic aspects of our gatherings - music, dress, structure, location, etc - but concerns the very substance of what it is to be church. The question is, if this is good, how deep are we willing to go?

At the heart of the matter is how we have sought to be community and how this journey has led us into a new romance with the God who is by nature community. We have had a new encounter with God as Trinity, not a hierarchical Trinity with God the Father as the CEO, Jesus as middle management and the Spirit on the factory floor, but with the Trinity as the root of radically mutual community ... of the meal table, not the boardroom table!

This is changing how we see and do leadership within communities, where we put the emphasis on the flow of gifting rather than the authority of a title or position. Each of us surrenders our gifts to the community and so each of our gifts, rather than being lost becomes animated from use and spreads through the community. When a prophet is willing to give their insight then all our eyes are opened in new ways; when the artist creates, we all find new ways to express ourselves.

So, how deep are we willing to let this change affect us? How much of our systems and structures are we able to challenge? Can we let a 'ground up' shift impact how we think about every part? Can it change the way we think about leadership, about ordination, about our structures? 

Can it change the way we think about leadership, about ordination, about our structures? 

A colleague of mine from Lichfield Diocese, Revd Richard Moy, challenged Synod why it 'locked its trainee clergy away for three years in a place full of other Christians'. I agree. We need to reflect on how we train our leaders, but have we got to go deeper? In this changing world, which will force our church to change, is it time to release leadership, to give it back to communities, to create a new way for sustainability which does not rely on a professional body but on equipping and resourcing communities to lead themselves? 

After a recent visit from our new bishop, one member of safespace said how great it was to share with him as he was not at all 'bishopy'! Is it time to reflect the shift from hierarchy to community, not only on the ground but can we as a church become a community of communities, where we rely on each other, where we support each other and allow the quietest voices to be as significant as the most powerful ones?

Mark Berry, Pioneer Leader, safespace, Telford.

If you have something burning to say and want to contribute to the Share weekly guest blog, please contact Karen Carter. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and are not necessarily shared by the Church of England, the Methodist Church, the United Reformed Church, Church Army, Fresh Expressions or any of its partners.

 

Comments

Prayers for the Movers and Shakers

Posted by Sue Butler on 17 February 10 - 23:18

By nature pioneers are also creative as well as boundary pushers. The Church will need to decide how much freedom it will really allow its pioneers to have as they create opportunities for Fresh Expressions of church. It's a scary business releasing control and giving authority away, whilst at the same time maintaining the strong sense of community and belonging that we have all come to enjoy in the Church of England. The Movers and Shakers need our prayers.

priesthood of the community

Posted by David Muir on 18 February 10 - 17:57

Mark: a great post. If the CofE is going to grasp this nettle, it needs to be clear about priesthood. We need to recapture a theology of priesthood in which Christ is THE priest, the body of Christ the church is corporately the priest to the world, and then only in a more derivative sense is an individual a priest. If we can convince the church that the body of believers as a community is the mediating and reconciling presence of Christ on earth, then that community does the essential work of Christ on earth, not the 'priests' merely helped by that wider body. If we don't win that theological argument, then I don't there is any hope of achieving what you are talkiing about here.

Trinity

Posted by Pam Smith on 26 February 10 - 12:18

"At the heart of the matter is how we have sought to be community and how this journey has led us into a new romance with the God who is by nature community. We have had a new encounter with God as Trinity, not a hierarchical Trinity with God the Father as the CEO, Jesus as middle management and the Spirit on the factory floor, but with the Trinity as the root of radically mutual community ... of the meal table, not the boardroom table!"

Surely this is the orthodox Christian view of the Trinity as expressed in the creeds?

In terms of priesthood, IMO the ordained priest is called to express and facilitate the priesthood of all believers, so an 'independent priest' is a nonsense because the charism is given for the church (like any other charism.)

While I agree training could be improved - what couldn't? - there's quite a strong Biblical precedent for withdrawing and preparing before undertaking a new phase of ministry and I think we mess around with that at our peril.